The Innocent Man – Where Are They Now? An Update

The Innocent Man
Photo Courtesy of

The Innocent Man is a Netflix docu-series that was released in 2018. The series followed the story of four men who were convicted of crimes they did not commit, and the subsequent legal battles to prove their innocence. The show brought to light the flaws in the criminal justice system and the devastating impact it can have on innocent lives.

The central figures of the series were Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot, both of whom received death sentences in 1985 for the murder of Denice Haraway. Although their confessions did not align with the alleged crime, they received guilty verdicts and have been battling for their release continuously. The series also showcased the narratives of Ron Williamson and Dennis Fritz, both wrongfully convicted for the murder of Debra Sue Carter.

Since the release of the series, there have been updates on the cases of the central figures. Tommy Ward has obtained a new trial, while Karl Fontenot’s legal team persists in their efforts to secure his release.

In 1999, authorities exonerated Ron Williamson and Dennis Fritz, but their story continues to serve as a cautionary tale. The Innocent Man has sparked a national conversation about the need for criminal justice reform and the importance of protecting the rights of the accused.

Key Takeaways

  • The Innocent Man docu-series shed light on the flaws in the criminal justice system. As well as the devastating impact it can have on innocent lives.
  • Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot have been fighting for their freedom since their wrongful conviction in 1985.
  • The series has sparked a national conversation about the need for criminal justice reform. Plus, the importance of protecting the rights of the accused.

The Innocent Man: A Brief Overview

The Innocent Man
Photo Courtesy of

The Innocent Man is a true-crime novel written by John Grisham and published in 2006. The book tells the story of four men who were wrongfully convicted of murder in Ada, Oklahoma, in 1982. The case involved the rape and murder of a young woman named Debbie Sue Carter. And the subsequent trials and convictions of Ron Williamson and Dennis Fritz, and later Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot.

The book is based on extensive research and interviews conducted by Grisham and his team. It sheds light on the flaws and injustices of the criminal justice system, particularly in small towns where corruption and prejudice can run rampant.

In 2018, Netflix released a docu-series based on the book, also titled The Innocent Man. The series features interviews with the victims’ families, the accused, and other key players in the case. It explores the lasting impact of wrongful convictions on the lives of those involved.

Since the release of the book and the Netflix series, there have been several developments in the case. In 1999, DNA evidence exonerated Williamson and Fritz, who had spent 11 years on death row. In 2019, Ward’s conviction was vacated, and he was released from prison after serving more than 35 years. Fontenot’s case is still pending, and he remains in prison.

Overall, The Innocent Man is a powerful and thought-provoking account of a tragic case of injustice, and it continues to raise important questions about the fairness and reliability of the criminal justice system.

The Central Figures

The Innocent Man, a Netflix documentary series, is a true-crime story about two murders in Ada, Oklahoma. The series features four men convicted of crimes based on very shaky evidence. The following paragraphs provide information on the central figures of the series.

Authorities convicted Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot of the murder of Donna Denice Haraway, who went missing from her job at a convenience store in 1984. The two men insisted they were innocent, but still ended up convicted of Haraway’s murder. More than 30 years later, they are still in prison. However, Tommy Ward is a step closer to freedom after a judge vacated his conviction in 2019.

Dennis Fritz was also convicted of Haraway’s murder and spent 11 years in prison before DNA evidence proved his innocence. He is now a free man and has written a book about his experience called “Journey Toward Justice.”

Authorities convicted Ron Williamson of the murder of Debra Sue Carter, leading to a 12-year stay on death row until DNA evidence established his innocence. He died in 2004, five years after his release.

Although Billy Charley could have been a potential witness in the Haraway case, the court did not utilize his testimony. He is still living in Ada, Oklahoma.

The Crime and Conviction

The Innocent Man
Photo Courtesy of

In 1984, a young woman named Donna “Denice” Haraway went missing from her job at a convenience store in Ada, Oklahoma. Her disappearance ignited a massive investigation, resulting in the eventual conviction of two men, Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot, for her kidnapping, rape, and murder.

The prosecution built its case against Ward and Fontenot primarily on their confessions, which police obtained after hours of interrogation without the presence of an attorney. Both men later recanted their confessions, asserting that police had coerced them and provided false information.

Despite the absence of physical evidence linking Ward and Fontenot to the crime, the court found them guilty and sentenced them to life in prison. The credibility of the case against them faced further scrutiny when another man, Glen Gore, came forward and claimed responsibility for Haraway’s murder.

In recent years, there have been several developments in the case. In 2016, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals initiated a hearing to decide whether to overturn Ward and Fontenot’s convictions due to newly discovered evidence. However, the state later canceled the hearing after appealing the decision.

In 2019, a federal judge nullified Ward’s conviction, asserting that his confession was coerced and had violated his constitutional rights. The judge further discovered that the prosecution had concealed evidence that might have benefitted Ward’s defense. Despite this, Fontenot’s conviction remains valid, and the state has lodged an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the decision to invalidate Ward’s conviction.

The case of Donna “Denice” Haraway remains unsolved, and law enforcement has never located her remains. Ward and Fontenot’s convictions have stirred substantial controversy, with many asserting that they wrongfully convicted them due to unreliable confessions extracted through coercive tactics.

The Controversial Confessions

The Innocent Man
Photo Courtesy of

The confessions of Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot were the centerpiece of the case against them. However, the authorities obtained the confessions under questionable circumstances, sparking extensive debate about their validity.

During lengthy interrogations, Ward and Fontenot were coerced into confessing to the murder of Denice Haraway. Ward’s confession was particularly controversial, as it was a “dream confession” in which he claimed to have dreamt about committing the crime.

The use of dream confessions in criminal trials stirs high controversy due to their frequent unreliability and susceptibility to manipulation by interrogators. In Ward’s case, there existed no physical evidence connecting him to the crime, and his confession constituted the sole evidence employed for his conviction.

In addition to the use of dream confessions, there were also allegations of coercion and misconduct during the interrogations. Ward and Fontenot both claimed that the police employed threats and intimidation. This led to them being coerced into giving confessions under a combination of physical and psychological pressure.

Even with these allegations, the legal system permitted the confessions to remain valid, resulting in the convictions of both Ward and Fontenot for murder. However, in the years since their convictions, both men have recanted their confessions and maintained their innocence.

The controversy surrounding the confessions in the Denice Haraway case highlights the importance of proper interrogation techniques and the dangers of relying solely on confessions to secure convictions.

The Appeals and Exonerations

The Innocent Man
Photo Courtesy of

Over the years, several appeals have been filed by the defendants in the cases featured in the book and television series “The Innocent Man.” These appeals were aimed at proving their innocence and securing their release from prison.

One of the most significant appeals was filed by Tommy Ward, who spent 35 years in prison for a murder he did not commit. In 2021, a judge ordered his release, but the appeals court overturned the decision, and he remains incarcerated. The Oklahoma Innocence Project and The Innocence Project have been working on his case and continue to fight for his exoneration.

In some cases, post-conviction relief has been granted, resulting in the exoneration of the defendants. For instance, Larry Youngblood was exonerated in 2000 after spending 16 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. The state agreed to his innocence after DNA evidence proved his innocence.

The Innocence Project and the Oklahoma Innocence Project have been instrumental in helping to secure exonerations for several defendants. They work tirelessly to investigate cases, file post-conviction relief motions, and appeal wrongful convictions.

In some cases, federal appeals courts have also played a significant role in exonerating defendants. For instance, in 2014, the National Registry of Exonerations announced that 2013 was a record year for exonerations in the United States. This was due in part to the efforts of federal appeals courts, which overturned several wrongful convictions.

The Legal Players

The Innocent Man documentary series features a cast of legal players who were involved in the trials and convictions of Tommy Ward, Karl Fontenot, Dennis Fritz, and Ron Williamson. Here is a brief update on where some of these legal players are now:

Bill Peterson

Bill Peterson, the district attorney who prosecuted Fritz and Williamson, has retired from his position. Peterson earned a reputation for his tough-on-crime stance and his vigorous pursuit of the death penalty in prominent cases. Critics scrutinized his management of the Fritz and Williamson case, with some implying that political ambitions might have influenced his actions. Peterson chose not to participate in interviews for the documentary series.

Mark Barrett

Mark Barrett, the defense attorney who represented Fritz, has continued to practice law in Oklahoma. Over the years, Barrett has participated in several high-profile cases, and his reputation is built on his assertive defense strategies.

The documentary series portrays Barrett’s unrelenting dedication to establishing Fritz’s innocence. This results in his client’s eventual exoneration due to the emergence of DNA evidence.

Attorneys and Prosecutors

The Innocent Man also features interviews with a number of other attorneys and prosecutors who were involved in the cases. These individuals provide insight into the legal system and the challenges of working on high-profile cases. Some of the attorneys and prosecutors featured in the documentary series include:

  • Gary Rogers, the prosecutor who tried Ward and Fontenot
  • Greg Mitchell, the defense attorney who represented Fontenot
  • Tommy Ward’s defense attorneys, David Prater and Rob Nigh


The documentary series also features interviews with several judges who presided over the cases. These judges provide insight into the legal process and the challenges of ensuring a fair trial. Some of the judges featured in the documentary series include:

  • Judge Frank Seay, who presided over the trials of Fritz and Williamson
  • Judge Steven Taylor, who presided over the appeal of Ward and Fontenot’s convictions

The Evidence Presented

The Innocent Man

The Netflix docu-series “The Innocent Man” explores the murder cases of two women in Ada, Oklahoma, and the questionable evidence presented during the trials of the men accused of their murders.

One of the most significant issues with the evidence presented was the lack of physical evidence connecting the accused to the crimes. Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot received death sentences for the murder of Denice Haraway due to their confessions, which the police obtained through questionable tactics.

However, the confessions did not match the physical evidence found at the crime scene. Forensic evidence indicated that Haraway died from a single gunshot wound to the head. And part of a red and white shirt was found near her remains. None of the physical evidence matched the clothing worn by Ward or Fontenot at the time of their arrest.

In Debbie Carter’s murder case, Ron Williamson and Dennis Fritz received convictions relying on eyewitness testimony and hair evidence discovered on the victim’s body. Nonetheless, DNA evidence subsequently demonstrated that the hair did not belong to either Williamson or Fritz, leading to their exoneration.

The docu-series also spotlights the presence of exculpatory evidence withheld from the jury during the trials. Regarding the Ward and Fontenot case, investigators later found that a jailhouse informant who had testified against them had actually committed perjury on the stand.

In return for his testimony, he was offered a reduced sentence. Additionally, the trial did not involve summoning an alibi witness who could have provided a compelling alibi for Ward.

Life in Prison

The murder of Denice Haraway led to the sentencing of Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot to life in prison, despite their continuous claims of innocence. Initially facing the death penalty, they obtained new trials in 1999. This resulted in renewed guilty verdicts but with commuted sentences to life imprisonment.

Currently, the Dick Conner Correctional Center in Hominy, Oklahoma, detains Ward, while Fontenot carries out his sentence at the North Fork Correctional Center in Sayre, Oklahoma.

Life in prison can be a difficult and challenging experience for anyone, especially for those who maintain their innocence. Correctional facilities impose strict rules and regulations on inmates, structuring their daily routines meticulously. Inmates experience limited interaction with the outside world and frequently endure prolonged periods within cramped cells. Furthermore, they must participate in work or educational programs to fill their time and aid in their reintegration upon release.

Despite these difficulties, many inmates find ways to cope and make the most of their situation. They form friendships with other inmates and participate in group activities such as sports, music, and art. They also maintain contact with their families and loved ones through letters, phone calls, and occasional visits.

For Ward and Fontenot, life in prison has been a long and difficult journey. They have spent over three decades behind bars, fighting to prove their innocence and clear their names. While they continue to maintain their innocence, they have also accepted the reality of their situation and have tried to make the most of their time in prison.

The Aftermath

The release of the Netflix documentary series “The Innocent Man” has sparked renewed interest in the case of Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot, who received convictions for the 1985 murder of Denice Haraway. The series explores the flaws in the investigation and trial that led to their convictions. It raises questions about the fairness of the justice system.

Since the release of the series, there have been no major developments in the case. Parole authorities have not granted parole to either Ward or Fontenot, and there is no indication that a retrial will be granted to them. Both men remain in prison, serving life sentences without the possibility of parole.

The state of Oklahoma, where the murder took place, has not acknowledged any wrongdoing in the case. The state has not taken any steps to address the issues raised by the documentary. Authorities have upheld the charges against Ward and Fontenot, and they continue to be regarded as accountable for the crime.

The case of Ward and Fontenot is just one example of the flaws in the justice system and the impact that these flaws can have on innocent people. The documentary series has initiated a conversation about the necessity for justice system reform and emphasized the significance of guaranteeing equitable treatment for all under the law.

While the aftermath of the case has not resulted in any major changes, it has brought attention to the issue of wrongful convictions and the need for reform. The documentary has shed light on the injustices that can occur in the justice system. It has also sparked a conversation about how to prevent these injustices from happening in the future.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the story behind Karl Fontenot and Tommy Ward?

Karl Fontenot and Tommy Ward were two men who were convicted of the murder of Denice Haraway, a young woman who disappeared from her job at a convenience store in Ada, Oklahoma in 1984. The case against them was largely based on coerced confessions. There was no physical evidence linking them to the crime.

What was the outcome of the trial for Karl Fontenot and Tommy Ward?

Both Karl Fontenot and Tommy Ward received convictions for the murder of Denice Haraway and were sentenced to life in prison. Nevertheless, in 2016, the DNA evidence discovered at the crime scene did not align with either of them, leading to their exoneration.

Has Karl Fontenot been released from prison?

Yes, Karl Fontenot was released from prison in 2019 after spending over 35 years behind bars for a crime he did not commit.

Is Tommy Ward still alive?

Yes, Tommy Ward is still alive. After his exoneration, he has been working to rebuild his life and adjust to his newfound freedom.


The Innocent Man docu-series and book have shed light on the wrongful convictions of Ron Williamson and Dennis Fritz, as well as Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot. The release of the series and book has brought renewed attention to the case and sparked discussions about the flaws in the justice system.

As of 2023, both Williamson and Fritz have passed away. Ward and Fontenot remain in prison, despite continued efforts to prove their innocence. The state has opposed Ward’s post-conviction filing, but a judge is scheduled to review the case in 2024. Ward’s attorney, Mark Barrett, will also be filing an appeal for exoneration.

The case of The Innocent Man serves as a reminder of the importance of fair trials and the consequences of wrongful convictions. While justice may not always be served, it is important to continue fighting for the truth and holding those in power accountable.